“No customer’s going to come to you and say, do you know why I bought your product? Your remarkable compliance with your internal development process. What they’re interested in is outcomes and impacts.” – Nigel Baker
Nigel challenges the traditional ways of measuring Scrum Master success. He points to tools like the Nokia test—which, he jokes, was neither a test nor invented by Nokia—as examples of process fidelity assessments that miss the point entirely. Compliance with a process tells you nothing about whether customers are satisfied or whether the team is delivering value. Instead, Nigel argues for measuring Scrum Masters on outcomes and impacts: customer satisfaction, revenue generation, and efficiencies—the same things a Product Owner gets judged on.
But he adds a crucial dimension that POs often overlook: team happiness. Not as an end goal, but as a leading indicator. Happy teams don’t leave. Happy teams do better work. Team contentness is a KPI that signals whether the deeper success factors are in place. When your team is deeply unhappy, no amount of velocity or story completion will save you from attrition and decline.
Self-reflection Question: How are you currently measuring your success as a Scrum Master—on process compliance, or on the outcomes, impacts, and wellbeing your team actually delivers?
Featured Retrospective Format for the Week: Keep It Fresh—A Different Format Every Sprint
Nigel’s answer to the “favorite retrospective format” question is deliberately controversial: he doesn’t have one. His approach is to use a different format every single sprint. Retrospective formats, he argues, “age like milk”—by Sprint 12, asking “what should we do differently?” with the same structure produces diminishing returns. Novelty creates energy. He sometimes gets teams to invent their own formats, which produces some of the most forensic and intense retrospectives he’s seen—teams building “superweapons” and then realizing they have to turn those weapons on themselves. But Nigel’s most practical tip is using retrospective techniques inside the Sprint Review. The Review is a product retrospective, and stakeholders shouldn’t sit “like Roman emperors in the Colosseum, watching the developers as gladiators.” Instead, use facilitation methods to extract “sweet, juicy, honey-flavoured feedback” from stakeholders about what they’d change in the product.
Transform Your Agile Teams with Hard-Earned Lessons from Super-Experienced Scrum Masters
Do you wish you had decades of experience? Learn from the Best Scrum Masters In The World, Today! The Tips from the Trenches – Scrum Master edition audiobook includes hours of audio interviews with SM’s that have decades of experience: from Mike Cohn to Linda Rising, Christopher Avery, and many more. Super-experienced Scrum Masters share their hard-earned lessons with you. Learn those today, make your teams awesome!
About Nigel Baker
Nigel Baker is a seasoned agile coach with a keen intellect, warm creativity, and thoughtful humour. With a career spanning software engineering, consultancy and global training, he inspires teams to thrive, not just perform. Outside work, he loves bold ideas, good conversation and a life well lived.
You can link with Nigel Baker on LinkedIn. You can also find Nigel at AgileBear.com.
